Google trend - Kejriwal news bail

Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, recently made headlines when he was granted bail in a defamation case filed against him by BJP leader Rajiv Babbar. The case was filed in relation to a tweet posted by Kejriwal in 2018, where he alleged that the BJP was behind the deletion of voter names from electoral rolls in Delhi. Babbar filed a defamation case against Kejriwal for making false and defamatory statements against him and the BJP.

On February 18, 2022, Kejriwal appeared before the court and was granted bail on a personal bond of Rs 10, The court also directed him to cooperate with the investigation and not to leave the country without permission. Kejriwal's lawyers argued that the tweet was made in the public interest and was not intended to defame anyone. They also pointed out that Kejriwal had already apologized for the tweet and had deleted it from his Twitter account.

This is not the first time that Kejriwal has been embroiled in a defamation case. He has faced several such cases in the past, including one filed by former Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit and another filed by former BJP President Nitin Gadkari. In both cases, Kejriwal was granted bail after appearing before the court and furnishing a personal bond.

Kejriwal's critics have often accused him of using defamation cases as a political tool to settle scores with his opponents. They argue that he makes sensational allegations against his rivals and then apologizes after the damage is done, thus avoiding any serious consequences. However, Kejriwal's supporters defend him, saying that he is simply speaking truth to power and exposing corruption and wrongdoing in the political system.

The issue of defamation laws in India has been a subject of debate for many years. Critics argue that the laws are often misused by politicians and powerful individuals to silence dissent and intimidate their critics. They say that defamation cases are often used as a tool to harass and intimidate journalists, activists, and others who speak out against the government or powerful interests.

On the other hand, supporters of defamation laws argue that they are necessary to protect the reputation and honor of individuals and to prevent the spread of false and defamatory information. They say that defamation laws are essential for maintaining a civil society and ensuring that people are held accountable for their words and actions.

In the case of Kejriwal, the granting of bail in the defamation case against him has once again brought the issue of defamation laws to the forefront. While some see it as a victory for free speech and the right to criticize those in power, others view it as yet another example of how defamation laws can be misused for political purposes. Ultimately, the debate over defamation laws in India is likely to continue as long as cases like Kejriwal's are brought before the courts.